Obama Education
In a 2001 interview Bill Ayers said he did not regret setting off the bombs he and the Weathermen were involved in. To complete this thought in that same interview, in the next sentence he was quoted as saying, 'I feel we didn't do enough.' He later 'clarified' his statement in a separate interview by saying 'we' meant all of us, not just the terrorist group in which he belonged. Does this obvious deception matter even if it were true? If bombing buildings is clearly and undeniably as far as a protester can go and he says be right, and it's obviously not, what is 'enough' beyond blowing up buildings? Is it blowing up buildings and people or blowing up 100 buildings instead of 50? Does 'we' mean not only Weathermen but a much wider range of terrorist protesters (and I don't mean protesters protesting terrorism)? Would it have been better to bomb more strategic areas for 'education' to more satisfactorily meet his hopes and dreams for a brighter tomorrow? Is this guy actually a professor?
The press brings up the fact that nobody died in these bombings except in the accidental pre-detonation of one which killed three. This obscures the issue, making light of these crimes. This group was not a demolition team contracted to bring down condemned, roped off, unpopulated buildings where there was no possibility of harming a soul. They bombed the Pentagon for crying out loud. Did this group somehow engineer bombs that would harm brick and mortar only and not flesh and bone? Is mankind bulletproof and could in no way suffer any negative effects of a building falling on their heads or shrapnel piercing their bodies? Possible lives being lost did not deter them then and Ayers is unrepentant now. It was divine intervention that saved any innocent person that might have died in these bombings. People survived despite Ayer's and his group's blatant disregard for human life. But to what extent does the “I feel we didn't do enough” dream go? This unrepentant doctor or professor or Dr. Terrorist was asked if he would use bombs against the U.S. in the future he said he could not dismiss the possibility of it.
And Ayers was not about saving people. Obama is not about saving you, only the economy, he says, and that could only happen as a socialist if indeed he had the messianic powers the media seems to think he has. The love of money indeed is a root of all kinds of evil.
Obama's connection with Ayers is abundantly apparent. You don't have to dig very deep to find evidence of it. The liberal press tries to dress the issue saying that it does not matter. It's funny that they do not preface this with 'it is not true, therefore, it does not matter.' Obama is not misunderstood or unjustly persecuted for whatever reason he or the media claims. Do I want my President to care less about whether I live or die even if I died at the hands of an anti-war protester terrorist? Do I want my President to pal around with someone who's willing to sacrifice my life for the anti-war cause? When Obama lies saying that he does not have a close tie with Ayers this further incriminates his character as a man we cannot trust with the highest office and greatest power held by one man in the world. It's not that Ayers was a protester that bothers me. It's the fact that he still thinks that protesting with a bomb is the preferred way to change hearts and sway minds. Wow. Please, strip search any man like this who wants to discuss politics with me. I might not make it out alive.
Jesus tells us, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is near.”
What does this new messiah tell us?